Apple, along all the other browser vendors, is working on extending WebDriver to be able to handle it through the web driver protocol which admittedly will be a much better, and standard, way of dealing with this problem. I strongly suggest not to try to use them now, unless you have a webkit guru close to you, and even in that case, just for small scale testing. Also, those are developers options, comes with absolutely no support commitment, and shall disappear anytime. The ugly? Some options are not even available through those well hidden menus, and can only be toggled from the command line, if you know their name. ![]() The bad news is that most of them are not accessible except if you are a webkit developer yourself and know how to enable specials internal debugging tools and menu. The “fake media”, called mock’ed media, is awesome, with hold for spatial frequency quality testing and so on! Now, there are options in Safari to enable and disable almost anything related to WebRTC, from media device listing, to ice candidate filtering, network address detection, etc. It is somehow simpler than Chrome and Firefox. Safari selenium implementation provides a method to indicate you are using SafariTechPreview and it finds it for you (the syntax may vary depending on the language wrapper you use). For STP, the corresponding web driver executable is in a different, but predictable, location. To really automate testing, chrome as command line switches, and Firefox use profiles, both of which are supported by most selenium clients.Īs far as Safari and SPT are concerned, there are good news and bad news.įirst, safari announced earlier this year the availability of safari web driver for safari 10+! The web driver implementation is bundled and distributed with safari. If you run more advanced tests, using selenium, and safari is on your machine, you can again get away with clicking yourself. Of course, some test are expecting you to click NO to succeed, so this can be interesting. If you run the WPT manually on your computer you can of course always click on the UIs whenever you are prompted. How to deal with no-camera, security prompt, HTTP/local server when manually testing or for Selenium instrumentation? Thanks to the outstanding efforts from CoSMo’s own Soares Chen, and great reviews from BoCoup’s rick waldron, the number of test for webrtc spec went from 50+ last year, to 200+ on June 6 and almost 800 today! The coverage is unsurprisingly improving, and the test suite represents today a great compliance indicator. I have already talked in previous posts about the set-up to test against Safari in general, I will address STP 33 here specifically. STP is updated every two weeks or so, so you should be able to stay very close to the )sometimes too sharp) cutting edge.Īs explained in a previous post, the world wide web consortium has it s own test suite, part of “test-the-web-forward” effort, called WPT (Web Platform Test). This works under both Sierra (10.12) and High Sierra (10.13) and i the way we recommend for people to test their software against for now. ![]() ![]() STP 32 more or less matches Safari 11, but STP 33 brought in a lot of fixes, and the capacity to fully automate WebRTC testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |